[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [tm-pubsubj-comment] Use Case Question
Scott, Welcome as a future committee member. I am very glad that we will working together very soon. I think that we met at Extreme Markup 2001 if I remember correctly. See my comments below. At 01:57 PM 12/7/01 -0800, you wrote: >I am trying to familiarize myself with the documents >available at the TC website. While reading the use >case for published subject registry >(http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tm-pubsubj/docs/registry-usecase.htm), >I could not understand why the definitions for Pubsubj >Creator/Modifier/Validator/User all refer to >pubsubj.dtd, rather than the instance of the DTD, >e.g., the .xml files shown on this page: >http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tm-pubsubj/docs/dc/ > >Perhaps I miss something big in terms of the intent of >this use case or the registry itself. > >Regards, > >Scott I am very happy that anyone is asking questions about the Use Case. It was submitted very early and has not yet been discussed in a meeting yet. There was a thread commenting on it last month though, which begins here. http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/tm-pubsubj/200111/msg00003.html Also, my comments on Bernard's reply http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/tm-pubsubj/200111/msg00009.html and then the thread on Published Subject = Subject Indicator + Subject Descriptor http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/tm-pubsubj/200111/msg00011.html and on the audience for the TM pubsubj http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/tm-pubsubj/200111/msg00015.html As you can see, we are in flux. I initially wrote the Use Case, especially the diagram, to try to get clearer myself and to begin an initial, exploratory discussion. I had a hard time seeming how this would work as part of the "semantic web" and wanted to know how others felt about this too. The main points that I wanted to stress in the Use Case was the need for a security check and IP agreement between the Published Subject creator and user. Yes, I think that we do need to expand on the definitions and give more detailed explanations about how the DTD or schema is used to create the instances of published subjects. I think that even this DTD is not the final word, so it may be a little too early to revise the Use Case yet without a thorough discussion first, so I left it as is, for now. Bernard can correct or clarify this if I am wrong. Best regards, Mary ************************************** Mary Y. Nishikawa, Technical Editor & EDMS Support XML Evangelist Technique/ InTouchSupport Documentation Schlumberger K. K. 2-2-1 Fuchinobe Sagamihara, Kanagawa 229-0006 Tel: +81-42-759-5376 Fax: +81-42-759-3563 **************************************
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC