[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [tm-pubsubj-comment] ISSUE 1 and ISSUE X
* Lars Marius Garshol | | Comments on the SAM draft has now raised two issues: | | psi-identification | | How does one identify which topics represent published subjects, | and which ones do not? * Bernard Vatant | | What is the purpose of this distinction? I created an issue for this because I see that a number of people consider this to be important, and so I feel that it is necessary to address that concern. Personally, I am not at all convinced that this is necessary, but we need to argue it out and settle it, therefore I made it a formal issue. (To put it another way: ask Martin Bryan and the people in this TC who have brought up the issue of telling published subjects in a published subject topic map from the machinery topics not intended to represent published subjects.) | Do you think this is a necessary distinction in any topic map, or is | it specific to SAM ? I don't think that's a valid distinction. The SAM is the model for all topic maps, so if it's an issue in any topic map it's an issue in SAM. * Lars Marius Garshol | | psi-set-psi | | How does one create a topic representing the set of all published | subjects defined as part of SAM in such a way that it can be | reliably merged? * Bernard Vatant | | I don't understand why this is an issue. We need a PSI for this set, | but in what is it a specific issue? I created an issue for this because it seemed to me that PubSubj ISSUE 1 was the same issue. Since SAM has to follow the PubSubj TC guidelines it has to follow the resolution of PubSubj ISSUE 1 (if I interpreted that issue correctly) I couldn't answer this question straight away, and so I created an issue for it. (Admittedly, that may have been unnecessary.) | Yes. I know I *have* to review the issues document altogether. Hope | to make it between today and tomorrow ... That would be great. If you can't make it, it's no tragedy, but if you did make it it would simplify things somewhat. -- Lars Marius Garshol, Ontopian <URL: http://www.ontopia.net > ISO SC34/WG3, OASIS GeoLang TC <URL: http://www.garshol.priv.no >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC