[tm-pubsubj-comment] Re: A Common Graph Syntax?

[Eric Miller <em@w3.org>]

On Mon, 2002-07-01 at 06:41, Murray Altheim wrote:

> few known difficulties (such as a lack of xmlns declaration). If RDF
> were expressed in GXL, it's not too far a leap to express XTM in GXL.

Thanks Murry for the suggestions. A common syntactic expression was not
necessarily at the core of my earlier post (rather on deployment, best
practice, etc.). However your above mentioned sentiment may provide a
interesting experiment in RDF/XML and XTM interoperability if anyone is
willing to try.

context... I'm still looking for a response on on what an application
would see if they dereferenced one of these PSI's
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/tm-pubsubj-comment/200205/msg00046.html

The following message provides one possible option
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/tm-pubsubj-comment/200205/msg00048.html in RDF/XML which in-turn can be dereferenced at http://www.w3.org/2002/05/29-psi/fruit

An 'experiment' then can potentially be found in expressing a simple XTM
and RDF/XML example in terms of N-Triples 
http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-testcases/#ntriples

N-Triples is a line-based, plain text format for encoding an RDF graph. 

The RDF/NT expression of the above example can be found at
http://www.w3.org/2002/05/29-psi/fruit.nt

Anyone interested in trying to represent any simple XTM instance data in
terms of this simple graph bases serialization as an exercises in
convergence?

-- 
eric miller                              http://www.w3.org/people/em/
semantic web activity lead               http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/
w3c world wide web consortium            http://www.w3.org/