[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [tm-pubsubj-comment] Published vs Public
Steve > At 22:49 20/08/02 +0200, Bernard Vatant wrote: > >So it seems to me that Deliverable 1 introduction should take that point > >into account, and > >replace existing references to the "Web" (semantic or otherwise) to a more > >generic > >"network" defined as a system where humans and machines want to exchange > >information about > >subjects, and where resources that network's members have access to are > >addressable > >through URIs (definition subject to re-wording). The same way we moved the > >specification > >from specific "topic maps" to a more generic "applications" ... > > > >Waiting the consensus on that to furbish the prose accordingly - not much > >to do actually. > > I agree 100%. As far as I was concerned, this was also the rationale for the > change of name from 13250 to XTM, which has since been adopted by WG3. The SAM > also uses "published" and I know of nobody who wants to revert back to the old > terminology. OK. We are tuned. > We should use the terminology that best captures the full generality, so > "network" > is more appropriate than "Web" - although you might consider using the Web to > exemplifying what we mean by a network, e.g. "a network (such as the Web)", > if you > think that might make things more explicit. That is basically what I have done in the new draft ... with a little anticipation of your answer :) Other comments welcome. Thanks Bernard
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC