Re: [tm-pubsubj-comment] Fwd : On "prohibition" of XTM and URNs

[Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no>]

* Murray Altheim
|
|    <topicMap xmlns="http://www.topicmaps.org/xtm/1.0";
|              xml:base="http://www.altheim.com/ceryle/psi/";>
|       <topic id="tnode"/>
|       <topic id="anode"/>
|       <topic id="snode"/>
|       <topic id="lnode"/>
|    </topicMap>

* Eric Miller
| 
| Change id to rdf:ID in the above, add the appropriate namespace and
| you've got the a valid RDF/XML version.  In the above example the
| namespace for the 'id' attribute is unknown [1]. I don't really
| expect that you actually mean this.

This is straightforward XTM, actually. I don't think it's any
different from how XSLT uses <xsl:template match="..."/>.
 
| Would the following fruit PSI example satisfy these requirements? 
| http://www.w3.org/2002/05/29-psi/fruit

Mostly. Personally, I'd be a little unhappy that I wouldn't be able to
put the http:/www.w3.org/2002/05/29-psi/fruit#Apple URI in my browser
and jump to that particular definition. That's not a violation of the
requirements, though.
 
For two unofficial examples, see
  <URL: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/geolang/docs/geolang-1.0a1.zip >

Comments very much welcome on the GeoLang mailing list.

-- 
Lars Marius Garshol, Ontopian         <URL: http://www.ontopia.net >
ISO SC34/WG3, OASIS GeoLang TC        <URL: http://www.garshol.priv.no >