RE: New OASIS data base and TC management

["Vivian Bliss" <vbliss@microsoft.com>]

Received.

Trying to muddle my way through the site.

Vivian Bliss
NUI Platform
Knowledge Management Team
X37212



-----Original Message-----
From: Bernard Vatant [mailto:bernard.vatant@mondeca.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 1:14 AM
To: tm-pubsubj@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: New OASIS data base and TC management



Folks

Since yesterday, all OASIS TC work has been transferred to a new back-end data base management. This includes TC web pages, members management, mailing list, meetings announcement, ballots and the like. 

The most visible consequences of that migration by now is that the TC Home Page looks very messy, working on and off, many old website documents being no more available from it (although individual URLs of the inner pages should continue to work OK ... if you had bookmarked them, of course). For some reason, the documents that have been uploaded into the new data base come from a backup of the website dating back to May 2002. I just had the bandwidth to add the last draft of Deliverable 1. I had to update in the data base the TC roster so that you keep being subscribed to this mailing list. Note that I added Patrick Durusau, Motomu Naïto and Eric Freese as voting members, since their three months prospective membership is now over, but we'll have to make that official at next meeting. 

Could you please confirm that you get this message OK and can post to the list, by answering to the list with cc to me.

Thanks

Bernard
_____________________________________

Bernard Vatant
Senior Consultant - Knowledge Engineering
www.mondeca.com
_____________________________________
| -----Original Message-----
| From: Peter Flynn [mailto:peter@silmaril.ie]
| Sent: mardi 11 mars 2003 21:42
| To: tm-pubsubj@lists.oasis-open.org
| 
| Bernard Vatant wrote:
| > The last version of Deliverable 1, revised by Steve, is on-line on
OASIS
| > server. Sorry for the long URL!
| [...]
| > Please send objections if any.
| 
| None except what Bernard said:
| 
| > I have one comment/suggestion: Should not "Recommendation 6" ...
| >
| > "A Published Subject Indicator should explicitly state its Published 
| > Subject Identifier."
| >
| > become "Requirement 4" ...
| >
| > "A Published Subject Indicator must explicitly state its Published 
| > Subject Identifier."
| >
| > Or better, be integrated into Requirement 3, in the following way:
| >
| > "A Published Subject Indicator must have exactly one Published
Subject
| > Identifier, and explicitly state it."
| 
| "Must" if it's a requirement; "should"/"may" if it's a recommendation.
| 
| ///Peter
| 
| 
| 
| ----------------------------------------------------------------
| To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
| manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>