[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [Fwd: Re: [tm-pubsubj] New Published Subject Indicator]
Forwarding a message I meant as a reply to Steve Pepper and the list. Patrick -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [tm-pubsubj] New Published Subject Indicator Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 06:52:12 -0400 From: Patrick Durusau <Patrick.Durusau@sbl-site.org> To: Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net> References: <FOEHKIENIPCJNPNFKGJNKEAJEAAA.pepper@ontopia.net> Steve, Replies below: Steve Pepper wrote: > * Patrick: > > | Let me try the published subject indicator example again, this time > | following Pepper's advice on "human-readable": > | > | <head> > | <meta name="keywords" content="apple" /> > | <meta name="location" content="http://psi.fruits.org/apple.html"; /> > | <meta name="type" content="published subject indicator" /> > | <meta name="publisher" content="Johnny Appleseed" /> > | <meta name="date" content="20030914" /> > | </head> > | <body> > | <p>Apple: Round firm fleshy fruit of a rosaceous tree</p> > | <p>Published Subject Indicator published by Johnny Appleseed on > | 2003-09-14</p> > | <p>The URI for this Published Subject Indicator is: > | http://psi.fruits.org/apple.html. </p> > | </body> > | > | Comments? (Not wedded to the actual statements that appear, just > | illustrative. Suggestions on constraints, if any, welcome.) > > I would say that this is acceptable. Not optimal, perhaps, but > it conforms to both the requirements and the recommendations as > I understand them. > > I'm not sure about the exact semantics of your five <meta> > elements, nor their relationship to DC: > > To what extent do the names of the property types (keywords, > location, type, publisher, date) -- and the ways in which you > using them -- conform to existing metadata recommendations, > in particular, Dublin Core? > My usage may not be conformant with Dublin Core, but that is due to error on my part. What I am advocating is adoption of unqualified Dublin Core metadata elements as the standard for meta data in Published Subject Indicators. (Some of which will need to be required so it would change the Dublin Core schema to that extent.) (Note that keywords are not part of Dublin Core and I really should drop that from future examples, although I think people can include other metadata not required or suggested by the TC in Published Subject Indicators.) BTW, really like your suggestion of dc:subject and dc:type (to replace my misuse of dc:description) in the other thread. Hope you are having a great day! Patrick > Steve > > -- > Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net> > Chief Executive Officer, Ontopia > Convenor, ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 > Editor, XTM (XML Topic Maps 1.0) > > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/tm-pubsubj/members/leave_workgroup.php. > > -- Patrick Durusau Director of Research and Development Society of Biblical Literature Patrick.Durusau@sbl-site.org Chair, V1 - Text Processing: Office and Publishing Systems Interface Co-Editor, ISO 13250, Topic Maps -- Reference Model Topic Maps: Human, not artificial, intelligence at work! -- Patrick Durusau Director of Research and Development Society of Biblical Literature Patrick.Durusau@sbl-site.org Chair, V1 - Text Processing: Office and Publishing Systems Interface Co-Editor, ISO 13250, Topic Maps -- Reference Model Topic Maps: Human, not artificial, intelligence at work!
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]