[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [tm-pubsubj] Range of Application
I expect that providing Registry / Repository support for the semantic content referenced as 'Technology Subjects - Symbol proxies' will be discussed at length in the new regrep-semantic SC . As co-chair I welcome any insights this group can share. http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep-semantic/ <quote who="Bernard Vatant"> > We have indeed all reasons to extend the scope, and I've been in favor of > that since the beginning. Deliverable 1 makes it pretty clear that the > fundamental notions of "subject" and "topic", even if the terminology is > borrowed from topic maps, have a very general range of application, > encompassing all technologies "dealing with subjects through formal > representations using symbols as proxies". > > Deliverable 1 is just mentioning some of those, like RDF. My guess is that > Deliverable 2 could more explicitly deliver an indicative list of such > major technologies, pointing at what type of proxies those technologies > use, what type of subjects they represent by those proxies, like the kind > of following table. > > Technology Symbol Proxies Types of subjects > > Topic Maps Topic Any > RDF Resource - URI Any > Thesaurus Descriptor Concept > Taxonomy Class Taxons > Ontology Class, Instance, Property Classes, Individuals and Relations > Library Subject Heading Categories of documents > Catalog Catalog Number Individuals (Products, Galaxies) > Not a minor point either, in terms of outreach. > > Bernard > -- Carl Mattocks co-Chair OASIS ebXMLRegistry Semantic Content SC CEO CHECKMi v/f (usa) 908 322 8715 www.CHECKMi.com Semantically Smart Compendiums (AOL) IM CarlCHECKMi
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]