Questions

[Patrick Durusau <Patrick.Durusau@sbl-site.org>]

Forwarded post from Lars Marius Garshol

(Lars had a problem with his message bouncing. Let me know if anyone 
else has this problem with the list.)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

We had an internal discussion here about a PSI set we're creating for
a customer, and I made some notes about questions that came up.

  - how to handle multiple languages? (in the URIs, the names, and the
    descriptions)

  - what is a good form for a PSI URI?

  - should URIs be name-based or meaningless? is there a difference
    between types and individuals here?

  - what should the subject indicator actually include?
    - what should a good textual definition look like?

    - to what extent should constraints on the use of the indicator be
      included?

    - what form should these constraints be in? prose? OSL/TMCL?

There's probably more, but this is what I can remember right now.


-- Lars Marius Garshol, Ontopian <URL: http://www.ontopia.net > GSM: +47 
98 21 55 50 <URL: http://www.garshol.priv.no >

** end forwarded message**
-- 
Patrick Durusau
Director of Research and Development
Society of Biblical Literature
Patrick.Durusau@sbl-site.org
Chair, V1 - Text Processing: Office and Publishing Systems Interface
Co-Editor, ISO 13250, Topic Maps -- Reference Model

Topic Maps: Human, not artificial, intelligence at work!