[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: [xtm-wg] TMs vs. RDF? (was RE: More Formal Semantics in Topic Maps: OIL, FaCT, RDF ... )
Alexander Sigel wrote: > > 2. TMs vs. RDF? > --------------- > i am not satisfied with the explanations i could find about the relationship > between TMs and RDF (or other schema languages or e.g. Schematron) and > hope we will see some clarification there. if RDF is more general, i.e. > TMs which allow scopes could be implemented in RDF: how would implementations > in other schema languages be different? > this still leaves the issue of interoperability with people using RDF > to express their ontology brokering approach on the web and should not > be neglected because it hinders the full acceptance of TMs. > I understand that Eric Miller recently gave an excellent presentation on "RDF Topicmaps" (http://purl.org/net/eric/talks/emiller-w9dd-20000519/) at the WWW9 conference in Amsterdam. Would this be an example of implementing TMs in RDF? Scott Tsao ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Wrox Wireless Developer Conference, Amsterdam, July 10-12. Choose from 40+ technical sessions covering application of WAP, XML, ASP, Java and C++ to mobile computing. Get your ticket to the future today! http://click.egroups.com/1/5689/3/_/337252/_/961432426/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To Post a message, send it to: xtm-wg@eGroups.com To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: xtm-wg-unsubscribe@eGroups.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC