[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [xtm-wg] Comments on the syntax proposal
[lars] The specification should make it clear that conforming XTM 1.0 implementations must use namespaces ... Forgive my density, but why? Can't we get the semantics of xlink processing without necessarily having an (namespace-using) link processor? [lars] ... and that recognition of names defined by XLink, XBase and XTM must be based on a namespace view of the document rather than an XML 1.0 view. ... Ditto on density, and what is a "namespace" view? What does it buy us that XML 1.0 processing does not? [lars] In other words, the namespace prefixes used in the XTM 1.0 DTD are not the only possible namespace prefixes for these namespaces. You mean "xlink:" could change to something else? How do we do DTD validation, then? S. ===== <!-- "To imagine a language is to imagine a form of life." - Ludwig Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations --> __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. http://shopping.yahoo.com/ -------------------------- eGroups Sponsor -------------------------~-~> eLerts It's Easy. It's Fun. Best of All, it's Free! http://click.egroups.com/1/9699/1/_/337252/_/974822743/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------_-> To Post a message, send it to: xtm-wg@eGroups.com To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: xtm-wg-unsubscribe@eGroups.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC