Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"

[Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com>]

[eliot]
> Or, WRT to my earlier response to this note, said another way: if
> this
> is the criteria, then Property Sets must also be eliminated because
> they
> absolutely have no formal mathematical constraint specification.

Ah! That was my hidden agenda when I asked how portable the OMG's
constraint language was.

There's a lot to be said for angle brackets as opposed to "Drawrings"
(as that sick sketch on SNL pronounced the word a decade or so ago...)
-- all the usual things that can be said for them. From that aspect
alone, property sets are attractive.

Back to the data model/processing model question: where to property
sets vs graphs fit into that? Is the property set the data model and
the grove the processing model?

S.


=====
<!-- "To imagine a language is to imagine a form of life."
     - Ludwig Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations -->

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. 
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/?.refer=text

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-~>
Do you have 128-bit SSL encryption server security?
Get VeriSign's FREE Guide, "Securing Your
Web Site for Business." Get it now!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/2cW4jC/c.WCAA/bT0EAA/2n6YlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->

To Post a message, send it to:   xtm-wg@eGroups.com

To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: xtm-wg-unsubscribe@eGroups.com 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/