[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [xtm-wg] The Future of TopicMaps.Org
"Mason, James David (MXM)" wrote: > > I believe several of Murray's points are worthy of replies. > > One of my greatest worries is that multiple development (as opposed to > support or marketing) groups lead to divergent results. > > There has been some good thinking from a variety of parties on models > associated with Topic Maps. Some of these have clearly been intended to > apply to all Topic Map varieties. Some may not have been so intended but did > not make their scopes clear. The good thinking deserves to be preserved in > some form. Any model that claims to include ISO/IEC13250 can be done only in > SC34, and I have reminded several of the parties engaged in modelmaking of > this. If some group were to undertake a model anywhere other than SC34-be it > in TM.org, OASIS, or the W3C-that group would run the risk of diverging from > the model efforts already beginning in SC34, and SC34 would certainly > disavow any such efforts as having nothing to do with Topic Maps. Perhaps then a division of the work makes the most sense. Things that have to do with Topic Maps in general could remain in SC34, whilst things having more to do with the XML serialization in XTM could proceed in a separate place, such as OASIS. As is probably not any secret by now, most of my interest is in getting XTM off the ground in the Web community, and I've devoted most of my topic map-related efforts to this. There's plenty of work to be done in both arenas, with a gradual fleshing out of both ISO 13250 and XTM by a number of specifications, both models, syntax and implementations of topic maps (such as required for i18n and other features). As you say, there does need to be a coordinated marketing effort as well, which was began under TopicMaps.Org and could continue somewhere like OASIS. I'm certainly (I hope that much was clear) trying to suggest that any XTM efforts impinge on what is properly the 'territory' of SC34, a territory which to me is fairly clear. I think we all have the general success of topic maps in mind, and I hope we can all work together toward that end. Murray ........................................................................... Murray Altheim <mailto:altheim@eng.sun.com> XML Technology Center Sun Microsystems, Inc., MS MPK17-102, 1601 Willow Rd., Menlo Park, CA 94025 In the evening The rice leaves in the garden Rustle in the autumn wind That blows through my reed hut. -- Minamoto no Tsunenobu ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-~> Do you have 128-bit SSL encryption server security? Get VeriSign's FREE Guide, "Securing Your Web Site for Business." Get it now! http://us.click.yahoo.com/2cW4jC/c.WCAA/bT0EAA/2n6YlB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------_-> To Post a message, send it to: xtm-wg@eGroups.com To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: xtm-wg-unsubscribe@eGroups.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC