[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [topicmaps-comment] Notions have existence .....
Hmm ... Can't resist to jump in there ... Sorry, I think I am going to repeat myself, but I'm amazed to see on that forum that kind of ontological debate, in the most ancient sense of it : "does unameit exist?" "what is existence?" etc. Those respectable (even if, as far as I am concerned, totally meaningless) interrogations are completely off-topic when it comes to topic maps use or understanding. The only problem is "do we agree we speak about the same thing?". If we agree, that's all we need for efficient information (and maybe knowledge) interchange etc etc (see a recent post about it) Whether the "thing" exists or not, or even to know if the question of its existence is meaningful, is pointless. There are terabytes of information, and heaps of knowledge about Santa Claus. If you want to answer a kid wondering if and how people deal with Santa Claus in France, you may have to know they call it overthere "Père Noël", but yes, they refer to the same old guy browsing the Christmas night with his reindeers. OK. And as soon as you have agreed, you can exchange those terabytes of information about this (non-existing?) being. Maybe the kid believes he's existing, and you don't. Pointless. That does not interfere with your common capacity of non-ambiguous conversation. Another example: I'm completely agnostic (as far as religion is concerned at least, and in many other domains), but I've been raised in a Christian environment and culture, have some notions on Judaism and Islam, and some good acquaintance with Buddhism and Hinduism. I can exchange on many religious subjects with religious people, and when I listen to J.S. Bach's Missa in B, I know what it's all about when I hear "Kyrie" or "Gloria" or "Credo". The absolute existence, non-existence, ontological essence of God has nothing to do with this conversation capacity. Santa Claus, God, Quantum Emptiness, Silence, Blacness ... exist *as subjects of conversation* as soon as we speak about them, which has been done much for any of those. And that's exactly what is needed to be the subject of a topic. And the question of knowing if it is relevant or not to talk about them is itself another subject we can talk about :)) Ontological Greetings Bernard
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC