[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [topicmaps-comment] RE: [humanmarkup-comment] Base Schema-artifact
Rex, Before (or as) I address some thoughts about primary schema (and more fully speak to Claude's very clear remarks) and the formation of ontology, I wish to ask if you can search your soul for an answer to what about the biological models of intelligence/perception/cognition/being is troublesome for most computer scientists. (Other than some of them are just very wrong, and poor science.) Is it merely a problem of sorting out the proper science from the mythology (such as humans are the only animal that has a cognitive process)? I am sure I do not fully understand why there is such bad blood between the AI camp, for example, and the notion to biology is relevant. I do know that the biological model is not well represented as a model that computer science can address (yet).... but what if a new model was advanced that was biologically more relevant and that was implementable as computer science. I am of course refering to my tri-level architecture work, but only as a summative work that hopes to bring the cognitive neuroscience of Pribram, Shaw and others into the e-commerce and intelligence technologies. Your thoughts? Anyone else?
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC