[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: [topicmaps-comment] Re: [topicmapmail] XML Schema for XTM DTD
Could anyone
prove that I'm wrong in my supposition that XTM cannot be
legitimately extended thru elements and attributes from other namespaces? Lets say that I want to add a couple more attributes from another namespace to instanceOf element. I can't see any way how it can be done at the moment. Is there actually a namespace identifier for the current version of XTM? Cheers, Max Voskob ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mary Nishikawa" <nisikawa@fuchinobe.oilfield.slb.com> To: "Steve Pepper" <pepper@ontopia.net>; <topicmapmail@infoloom.com> Cc: "Daniel L. Koger" <daniel@kogers.com>; "Max Voskob" <mvoskob@msi.net.nz> Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 3:06 PM Subject: Re: [topicmapmail] XML Schema for XTM DTD > At 13:22 2003/02/02 +0100, Steve Pepper wrote: > >It is way past time we did an XML Schema for the XTM DTD. > > > >Thanks for raising this issue, Max, and thanks for chiming in, Daniel! > > > >As I understand, both Max and Daniel have created their own XSD versions > >of the XTM DTD. Would there be any chance of the two of you getting together > >to compare notes and come up with a definitive version? If so, that would be > >of great help to the committee. > > Yes, Steve, I have a version too :) > > Max, thanks for sending yours to the list. XML Spy is a great tool, isn't it :) > Our versions are a little different though and it would be good to compare > them. I did mine last year and included the psi for languages and the > standard PSIs that came with the xtm.dtd (pre ISO annex). I would need to > take these out, I think. > > It would be good to compare these with Daniel's, if he would like to > participate, come up with a draft and have it reviewed, and tested. I > think that there are various ways to approach writing the schema as Murray > mentioned, but that doesn't mean that an informative version can't be > published. As long as the xml that is created is consistent with the xml > that is created from the DTD, it should be fine. > > There are just some tools that need the XSD, and it would be a good thing > to provide it. > > From the reply that I have received from the UDDI Committee, it may not be > something they need now, but others will request it too, and it would be > good to have one "version." > > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/uddi-spec-comment/200301/msg00003.html > > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/uddi-spec-comment/200301/msg00004.html > > > >*Steve P. > >If you could then submit it, I will do what I can (with Mary's help!) to > >ensure that it gets the ISO stamp of approval as soon as possible. > > Thanks Steve! > > Cheers, > Mary > > |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC