RE: [tosca-interop] Question on Dale's provisional semantics doc

[Dale Moberg <dmoberg@axway.com>]

Hi Travis

I know there are some rows out of place in the tables of qnames and idrefs used in tosca 11. I am planning on reviewing and fixing those when putting the draft contents into the "official" template.

I am mainly trying to explain the contexts where references are made. I think ImplementationArtifacts were referenced in v11 within the content of NodeType elements, under a child element "Interfaces". (But qnames are used to refer to the artifacts, and I think I misplaced them. ) I am not sure what is meant by "collapsed" ? I will go over the tables again for mistakes. Additional reviewers would help.

One additional SC discussion item would be on whether to update any changes that have occurred (in xpaths, types, references) between the tosca version 11 xsd and the version 13. If anyone has suggestions about what needs to be changed in documenting the changes in references, I would welcome receiving them. I have not yet studied v 13 as thoroughly as v 11. The schema style has changed considerably as far as defined complexTypes and elements...

Dale

-----Original Message-----
From: tosca-interop@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:tosca-interop@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of Travis Tripp
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2013 9:07 AM
To: tosca-interop@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [tosca-interop] Question on Dale's provisional semantics doc

Dale,

I downloaded your provisional semantics guide and in your example, it shows ImplemenationArtifacts defined in the NodeType.  These should be in the NodeType implementation. Were you showing what it would look like collapsed?

Thanks,
Travis