[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [tosca-interop] Groups - TOSCA Abstract for ODCA Forecast Panel 2014-06-16a.docx uploaded
No problem about the late delivery. I’ll try to fold your suggestions in before our meeting. On one hand all the suggestions are certainly good ones, but I must point out
that the abstract is getting longer with each suggestion received to date, and starting to look more like a very good executive summary (or a whitepaper opening chapter that we could use!), rather than a “pitch” intended to get interested parties to enter
the room. I cannot help but wonder if, as you say, matching requirements to capabilities is a more technical aspect, and if it is needed in an abstract. Also, are we stealing too much of our thunder now? I’m not sure.
Best, Paul
From: Beins, Karsten [mailto:karsten.beins@ts.fujitsu.com]
Hi Paul, First of all, sorry for having missed your deadline on last Friday due to my holidays last week.
In your draft I think you have already mentioned most of the key aspects that we had identified while working on the CIO slide deck.
As expected for such a compact abstract, many sentences are very heavyweight and cause a need of multiple reading (at least for me). Just an observation, no
need to change, I think. There are two aspects that I’m still missing a bit:
-
In paragraph #2 dependency descriptions are not only needed between application components but also regarding infrastructure hardware and software
components. Depending on the role of a visitor infrastructure dependencies may be of high interest. You actually touch on that aspect vaguely in paragraph #3 , but it’s pretty hidden in my mind. -
TOSCA enables automated requirement-to-capability matching. This is a key TOSCA feature laying the foundation for the “truly competitive ecosystem”
that you correctly highlight. Admitted that this is a somewhat more technical aspect, but technically focused people are part of our target audience on ODCA Forecast. I think so far you don’t mention this aspect at all, therefore I’d suggest to try adding
it somewhere in paragraph #3. Thanks, Karsten From:
tosca-interop@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:tosca-interop@lists.oasis-open.org]
On Behalf Of Lipton, Paul C Dear (interop) TOSCA-teers, As agreed in today’s SC meeting (June 16th), please find the below document (track changes) for your comments and suggestions. Would you please provide your comments
no later than Friday. As asked, I will provide merged version for discussion/revision/approval on our Interop SC meeting of June 23rd.
Thanks, Paul From:
tosca-interop@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:tosca-interop@lists.oasis-open.org]
On Behalf Of Paul Lipton
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]