RE: [trust-el] Reminder to provide input on how to structure phase 2 analysis

[Colin Wallis <Colin.Wallis@dia.govt.nz>]

Thanks Mary

I thought it was pretty good.

I had two small additions.

 

1)     I think d) ‘privacy and/or confidentiality issues’ could do with expansion to account for the notion of user consent for attribute release/exchange, since many jurisdictions have this as a mandatory requirement. 

2)     Under 2a ‘family of methods (perhaps [a] mechanism for raising or enabling trust)’, I think we should add ‘or a combination of methods from different families for raising or enabling trust’.  I think this sets us up better for Phase 3, where we may want to ‘mix ‘ match’ to adequately cover form factors and give guidance on what methods or combinations of methods to use at different LoAs.

Cheers

Colin

 

 

 

From: trust-el@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:trust-el@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of Mary Ruddy
Sent: Wednesday, 6 June 2012 5:13 a.m.
To: trust-el@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [trust-el] Reminder to provide input on how to structure phase 2 analysis

 

This is a reminder to provide input on how we should structure the phase 2 analysis questions, or on any issues you see with the attached straw man approach.

====
CAUTION:  This email message and any attachments contain information that may be confidential and may be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, disclosure or copying of this message or attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email message in error please notify us immediately and erase all copies of the message and attachments. Thank you.
====