Re: [ubl-cmsc] Assembly Rules

["Eve L. Maler" <eve.maler@sun.com>]

I got the impression that since the UBL effort will produce canonical 
document types, and since we're planning to allow for customization of 
those types, building up new document types from the component pieces isn't 
really an immediate need.  But I'm willing to believe that my lack of ebXML 
experience may have led me astray.

         Eve

At 04:22 PM 11/16/01 +0100, Matthew Gertner wrote:
>6) Do we still need assembly rules? There has been discussion that the
>construction of larger BIEs from core components using standard schema
>languages eliminates the need for a separate assembly language.

--
Eve Maler                                    +1 781 442 3190
Sun Microsystems XML Technology Center   eve.maler @ sun.com