Re: [ubl-csc] [Fwd: [chairs] RE: New OASIS TC FAQ Pages]

[jon.bosak@sun.com]

Anne,

The top-level FAQ is something completely different from what
you're working on.  It's basically what we would put in a brochure
if we were using a Q&A format.  That's why I'm saying that I think
I can put this together out of marketing stuff we've already got.

Jon

   Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 23:51:19 -0700
   From: Anne Hendry <anne.hendry@sun.com>
   CC: tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au, ubl-csc@lists.oasis-open.org

   Hi,

   I was the owner of the FAQ that would arise out of the LC work - seeding 
   it with
   comments we received on .70 and .80 that were actually questions, as well as
   some questions that were sent to the ubl-comment and ubl lists.  If you have
   other material as well, Jon, should we try to merge these?  I'm not 
   exactly sure
   what the top-level TC FAQ is for.  It may be more for general TC-related and
   process-related questions, whereas the FAQ we were discussing from the LCSC
   was more to answer some specific (and sometimes detailed technicat) 
   questions
   that have come in about the release.  What is it that you're thinking of 
   for that
   top-level FAQ?  Should we have both?

   -Anne

   jon.bosak@sun.com wrote:

   >| Marion suggested that the QA team in LCSC deal with FAQ-type
   >| issues.  Shall we pass this on to them?
   >
   >Unless someone is really eager to take it on, I think this one's
   >mine.  I can start by reworking some materials I already have to
   >hand.
   >
   >Jon
   >
   >You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl-csc/members/leave_workgroup.php
   >
   >  
   >