Re: Who's doing what with codelists

[jon.bosak@sun.com]

Anne Hendry tells me that, in consultation with Ken, she is
willing to take responsibility for tracking (not deciding!) these
two items:

 - Identification of the core code lists that we have to build
   ourselves for 1.0: LC; looks like countries and currencies

 - Cataloguing other code lists needed for "out of the box"
   operation: either LC or the codelist team, we don't seem to be
   sure which

Is that OK with everyone?

Jon

   Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 16:42:32 -0700 (PDT)
   From: jon.bosak@sun.com

   OK, so putting together Ken's and Mark's responses under this
   heading, I get the following set of codelist-related tasks,
   owners, and current status:

    - Standards for codelist metadata (versioning etc.), including
      creation of the UBL Committee Spec and shepherding it through
      the OASIS process: NDR; mostly done

    - Identification of the core code lists that we have to build
      ourselves for 1.0: LC; looks like countries and currencies

    - Cataloguing other code lists needed for "out of the box"
      operation: either LC or the codelist team, we don't seem to be
      sure which

    - Gross architecture of code lists in general (e.g., whether
      codelist-specific ancillary data goes in appinfo or in adjunct
      files): NDR; my impression is that this is on hold pending
      input to NDR from the codelist team

    - Gross architecture of adjunct files if that's the approach we
      decide to take: codelist team; not part of the UBL spec per se,
      but a gating item in the next task on the list

    - Construction of the core code lists that we have to build
      ourselves for 1.0: codelist team

   Jon