Re: [ubl-csc] Revised outcomes of coordination call 12 December 2003

[Anne Hendry <anne.hendry@sun.com>]

Thanks for the update, Mark.  I didn't realize 2.01 was finished.
I thought I had heard someone say there were still some changes
going on and that it would be finalized in December,
but I see now that it's already available.

http://www.untmg.org/news20031123.html

-Anne

CRAWFORD, Mark wrote:

>Anne wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Currently, AFAIK, UBl 1.0 Beta supports CCTS 2.0.  But you note above
>>that ccts 2.01 is quite stable.  So this already raises questions:
>>When did it become stable?  Are we expected to move to 2.01?  Or
>>have we already moved to 2.01?  If not, will we move to 2.01 for the
>>final UBL release?  Is 2.01 available to the public now?  If 
>>so, where?
>>What were the changes?  What do we do if CCTS 2.02 comes along in the
>>meantime, or there is 'one more small change' to CCTS 2.01 - what is
>>the cutoff date for CCTS changes?
>>    
>>
>
>The ONLY difference betweeo 2.0 and 2.01 is the title and reintroduction of ebXML references.  I would have preferred issuing CCTS 2.0 Second Edition with a note that it was just errata, but was overrulled by Klaus for his usual political shenanigans.
>
>Mark
>
>To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl-csc/members/leave_workgroup.php.
>
>
>  
>