[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ubl-dev] SBS and Restricted Data Types
At 2006-05-03 06:12 -0600, stephen.green@systml.co.uk wrote: >One other thing though: How would you reckon the feasibility >of logically validating that a subset which includes pattern >restrictions of strings is a true strict subset of a schema? My gut reaction is that is quite challenging to do *for a schema* ... but of course one could create an assertion schema in Schematron to check that. >Is it a step too far for now? If so I'd propose that adding >pattern restrictions might best be kept to specific agreements or >individual software implementations rather than including such >in a standardisation effort such as the SBS. What would be examples of pattern restrictions? Perhaps I'm misunderstanding ... I can't see what you would want to restrict at the level of a string in a formal subset. . . . . . . . . . Ken -- Registration open for XSLT/XSL-FO training: Wash.,DC 2006-06-12/16 Also for XSLT/XSL-FO training: Minneapolis, MN 2006-07-31/08-04 Also for XML/XSLT/XSL-FO training:Birmingham,England 2006-05-22/25 Also for XSLT/XSL-FO training: Copenhagen,Denmark 2006-05-08/11 World-wide on-site corporate, govt. & user group XML/XSL training. G. Ken Holman mailto:gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/u/ Box 266, Kars, Ontario CANADA K0A-2E0 +1(613)489-0999 (F:-0995) Male Cancer Awareness Aug'05 http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/u/bc Legal business disclaimers: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]