Re: [ubl-dev] Question on UBL NDR major/minor

[jon.bosak@sun.com]

[marc@marcdegraauw.com:]

| I'm working on versioning for the Dutch Criminal Justice Chain
| (ePV project). We follow the UBL NDR 1.0, though we do not use the
| UBL vocabulary itself. We aren't very happy with the NDR 1.0
| reflection of minor changes in the namespace
| (i.e. urn:oasis:names:tc:ubl:schema:xsd:Invoice-1.0) and I saw
| this had been dropped in NDR 2 (i.e.
| urn:oasis:names:tc:ubl:schema:xsd:Invoice-2).
| 
| My question is how stable this particular change is, is this still
| under discussion or is it very probable this change will make it
| into the final NDR 2 specs. The reason for this questions is on
| points where we do not follow NDR 1, we would of course like to
| align with NDR 2 as closely as possible.

The UBL TC is reasonably sure that we will keep the same namespace
URIs in minor versions -- sure enough that this is the form we
will be using in UBL 2.0.

Jon