[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl-dev] context hierarchy
You are correct, not all context drivers are hierarchical and so inheritance is not a given. This is yet another example of how contextualization is not apparently a simple classification problem as we once thought. UBL has been working hard on addressing the customization questions arising from practical experience with implementing UBL 1.0 As you will see shortly with UBL 2.0 we have taken a different approach allowing for highly customized contexts to be implemented. Much as this is being based on Ken Holman's fine paper entitled "UBL 2.0 subsets, extensions, versions, validation and interchange". If you want a general feeling for what this means you can find his paper at: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/18849/gkholman-ubl-modeling-0.4.zip Kutlu Binark wrote: > hi all, > > I do have a question related to customization of UBL schemas based on > context values. I am reading through "Guidelines For The Customization of > UBL v1.0 Schemas, Working Draft 1.0, 04/22/04". Section 3.3.1 states: > > "..any given context driver can be specialized, but not reset. Thus, > if the > Geopolitical context driver with a value of "USA" has been applied to a > type, > it is possible to apply it again with a value that is a subset, or that > occupies a hierarchically lower level than that of the original value, > like > California or New York, > but it cannot be applied with a value equal or higher in the > hierarchy, like > Japan. In order to use that latter value, one must go up the ladder of > the > customization chain > and derive the type from the same location as that from which the > original > was derived." > > Is it safe to interpret above as; when a component 'C' is customized > for a > context value 'X'; customized 'C' also becomes applicable for all context > values hierarchically lower than 'X'. > > For the case of geopolitical context this assumption seems rather safe > but I > could not be sure for other context drivers such as Industrial > Classification. > > Thanks in advance, > Kurt Banark > -- regards tim mcgrath phone: +618 93352228 postal: po box 1289 fremantle western australia 6160 web: http://www.portcomm.com.au/tmcgrath
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]