[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl-dev] Comments on UBL-NDR 2 Versioning
Quoting Chin Chee-Kai <cheekai@SoftML.Net>: > At 10:24 PM 2006-11-12 +0100, Marc de Graauw wrote: >> The term 'compatibility' is not defined. It's very likely the spec uses it >> in the sense of backward compatibility, where every UBL version n document >> is a valid instance of an UBL version n+1 language definition, but since >> this is a thorny issue, I suggest the meaning of 'compatibility' should be >> defined. > > A very point-blank note indeed. When I attended the recent UBL TC meeting > in Singapore, there appeared to be general reluctance (myself included) to > tackle head on with this topic, together with other heavy-weight words like > "compliance", "interoperable", "customization". And the worse is certainly > to try to talk about them all at once; Hi Chin, Pardon my uneducated question, I've probably missed something important but - why?
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]