[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl-dev] Mentioning codelist perculiarities...
Beautiful ! However there is a big difference between cock-ups and deliberate policy which is why the email response to you has been placed on the web so others can review the historical facts http://www.oic.org/z/XZIG/UNCEFACT/IXUAEN1.htm Any comments particularly on how to resolve the issue within EDIFACT-UN/CEFACT would be appreciated as the Tenders for the Melbourne Port and Victorian 32 Local Government Agencies are critical for early 2007 WOULD IT BE ACCEPTABLE TO REPLACE THE FOLLOWING DATA ELEMENTS IN THE "NAD" DATA SEGMENT 1 CO58 2 CO80 3 CO59 WITH THE COMPLEX VERSION OF AS 4590 http://www.oic.org/z/XZIG/AS4590/add/ Comments would be appreciated by 17:00 Wed 20 Dec Sydney time for the eCommittee review Thu 21 Dec 2006 Thank you Stephen GOULD Chair XML & ECOMMERCE SPECIAL INTEREST GROUP On 17 Dec 06, at 15:49, David RR Webber wrote: > Came across this today - this is probably so the "enemy" does not know where > the troops are - but then again - how do they get their mail?!? > > > > http://www.usps.com/ncsc/lookups/usps_abbreviations.html > > > > and > > > > > Military "State" > > Abbreviation > > > Armed Forces Africa > > AE > > > Armed Forces Americas > (except Canada) > > AA > > > Armed Forces Canada > > AE > > > Armed Forces Europe > > AE > > > Armed Forces Middle East > > AE > > > Armed Forces Pacific > > AP > > > > > > > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]