[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl-dev] UBL Order
Hi > Hi, > > > > I am currently working on mapping trading partner order requests to a > UBL order and have a couple questions. > > > > Where would you recommend that I map the following? > > 1. FOB code and description (FOB Origin, FOB Destination...) Order/cac:DeliveryTerms/cbc:ID (Incoterms 2000) > > 2. Ship Method (Air Freight, Motor Freight, Customer Pickup...) > > 3. Carrier Code (FedEx Priority, UPS 3-Day, UPS Ground...) The Delivery/Despatch info provides only general info. The Order document is designed for even complex orders so the Shipment info are actually available only in the line items. Order->OrderLine->LineItem->OrderedShipment->Shipment inside Shipment you can specify general info on the whole shipment, but if you need to specify more detailed info about the Transport contracts you will have to use the Consignment which is available inside the Shipment aggregate. Then your data could be best mapped into the FinalDeliveryTransportationService entity. > > > > I also am confused by the different parties. Am I correct in assuming > that I can map the following? > > > > Sold To -> Buyer Customer Party > from the Order point of view it is more relevant to specify who is issuing the Order (Buyer) the AccountingCustomerParty has the responsability for taxes and accounting payables. If you do not specify an AccountingcustomerParty it means it is the same of the Buyer. Please note the Buyer is mandatory. > Bill To -> Accounting Customer Party as explained before, yes if differs from the Buyer. > > Ship To -> Delivery > yes this is the final receiver. Delivery/Despatch is the Transport company > > > Our trading partners pass us a DUNS number (Dun & Bradstreet) that > uniquely identifies them. Where should I map this? To the Buyer Customer > Party -> Party > Party Identification > ID? > > BuyerCustomerParty/cbc:CustomerAssignedAccountID This is an ID issued by the Customer, and it is intended as an accounting\ERP ID which is the same of DUNS. of course the Party Identification is correct but more general. > > Sorry if these questions are unclear I am relatively new to this. > > > > Thanks > > Jeremy > > > > You're most welcome Have FUN! Roberto -- * JAVEST by Roberto Cisternino * * Document Engineering Services Ltd. - Alliance Member * UBL Italian Localization SubCommittee (ITLSC), co-Chair * UBL Online Community editorial board member (ubl.xml.org) * Italian UBL Advisor Roberto Cisternino mobile: +39 328 2148123 skype: roberto.cisternino.ubl-itlsc [UBL Technical Committee] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ubl [UBL Online Community] http://ubl.xml.org [UBL International Conferences] http://www.ublconference.org [UBL Italian Localization Subcommittee] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ubl-itlsc [Iniziativa divulgativa UBL Italia] http://www.ubl-italia.org
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]