[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl-dev] cXML Order Request to UBL Order
At 2009-07-07 11:06 -0400, Marzka, Jeremy wrote: >I am in the process of mapping trading partner documents in various >formats to a UBL Order layout. The document I am currently working >on is a cXML Order Request and I am not sure where to map the >following header fields: Here are my guesses: >Order total /po:Order/cac:AnticipatedMonetaryTotal "An association to the total amounts for the Order anticipated by the Buyer." >Third party billing /po:Order/cac:AccountingCustomerParty "An association to the Accounting Customer Party. The party that Invoice is expected to be sent to if not the buyer party." >Drop ship PO/release /po:Order/cac:DeliveryTerms >Payment terms /po:Order/cac:TransactionConditions >Ship Complete (For the header) /po:Order/cac:DeliveryTerms >Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. I don't have an accounting background, so I don't even recognize some of your terminology (such as drop ship PO and release), but I hope that my guesses turn your face in the correct direction. Please don't take my interpretations as gospel ... I'm trying to learn here myself by throwing up straw-man suggestions to be torn down if necessary. I hope the business experts on the list will provide their own suggestions. I'm also working with OASIS regarding setting up a collaborative environment on UBL.xml.org where each and every business entity in UBL can be discussed. >I'd also be interested to hear what your process is to find >equivalent fields in UBL. I'm looking through the HTML summary reports found here: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/resources/ubl/index.htm#ubl2modelreport ... because the hyperlinking through the tables is very quick, and they copy most of the information from the spreadsheets. Note there are two main sections: the definitions and the tables. Numeric hyperlinks link back and forth switching between the two sections. Alphabetic hyperlinks link within the same section. >It seems to me like there isn't much documentation for the >recommended use of the fields. True ... my personal perspective is that it is not the UBL TC's role to tell a community of users *how* to use UBL, just to provide the standardized framework within which a community of users can send their information between parties using agreed-upon constructs. I hope this helps. . . . . . . . . . . . . Ken -- Possible July/August XSLT/XQuery/XSL-FO training in Oakland/CA/USA Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/u/ Training tools: Comprehensive interactive XSLT/XPath 1.0/2.0 video Video lesson: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PrNjJCh7Ppg&fmt=18 Video overview: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VTiodiij6gE&fmt=18 G. Ken Holman mailto:gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com Male Cancer Awareness Nov'07 http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/u/bc Legal business disclaimers: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]