Re: [ubl-dev] Field for Item Identification based on EAN / GS1 Classification

[Stephen Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com>]

Looks like OIO-UBL prescribes something like this

<cac:SellersItemIdentification>
   <cbc:ID schemeAgencyID="9" schemeID="GTIN">5712345780121</cbc:ID>
</cac:SellersItemIdentification>

This might depend on use of a profile agreed between parties or
provided by a third party like NES or OIO-UBL.
The  Item. Standard_ Item Identification. Item Identification is
probably fine if you need to use SellersItemIdentification for
something else. Some systems might only take SellersItemIdentification
and not be looking for StandardItemIdentification in the document.


Best regards

Steve
---
Stephen D Green




On 14 September 2010 18:51, Danny Gaethofs <dgaethofs@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I have been looking for the field to use for communicating the product code
> conform the GS1 GTIN classification system.
> When looking into ITEM what possibly could be a good match would be:
> - Item. Standard_ Item Identification. Item Identification
> whereas I will have to identify the issuer party
> The issuer party definition says "An association to Issuer Party i.e. the
> Party that issued the Item Identification." and here I do not find a match
> because it is not GS1 who issued the party identification but the supplier
> who uses the GS1 assigned range.
>
> OR I could use with of course the same doubts about the issuer party
> - Item. Additional_ Item Identification. Item Identification
>
> Am I overlooking something ? Has anyone used EAN / GS1 GLN's in an UBL
> Invoice
>
> kind regards
> Danny
>
>