[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Mime types for UBL 2.1 JSON Alternative Representation
Dear UBL Committee Tradeshift is happy to see the formalization of an JSON alternative UBL representation in form of JSON (draft-04) Schemas [0]. We are in the process of aligning our own JSON representations to match these. In that process, we would like to differentiate between our own JSON representation and the official [0] using Mime Types (RFC7231, Section 3.1, Content-Type; RFC4288 Section 3.2). While we could use our own, vendor-based, Mime Type for this purpose, we strongly believe in inter-operability and standardization. I have been unable to find any previous discussion of this, please bear with me if this has been discussed before: Are there plans for submitting Mime Types for UBL to IANA [1]? If such name(s) has been submitted, what are they? In liu of any previous discussion, we would like kick it of the following suggestions: # Universal Business Language XML Canonical Representation application/vnd.oasis.ubl+xml # Universal Business Language JSON Alternative Representation application/vnd.oasis.ubl+json Thank you for your consideration. [0] https://docs.oasis-open.org/ubl/UBL-2.1-JSON/v1.0/UBL-2.1-JSON-v1.0.html [1] https://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types Kinds regards Troels Nørgaard Tradeshift
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]