Re: [ubl-hisc] SBS and input specs

["Stephen Green" <stephen_green@bristol-city.gov.uk>]

Well for now we only have cardinality applied to elements in UBL but
I guess that might not always be the case. I do like the idea of keeping
the definitions to things applicable even outside of UBL.
In the same vein I don't think we can always assume that attributes will be uniquely 
named as they don't get the same scrutinity that the elements do (not sure
if that is due to the CCTS spec or not but I suspect it may be). I'll need some time to 
look into this more with the NDR.

All the best

Steve



Ken wrote:

So, for one new feature, we have to add the cardinality of each element and 
attribute (not sure yet how to do it for attributes ... Steve, can I assume 
that every attribute is uniquely named across the set of all attributes, 
regardless of the namespace in which they are declared?).  Before I 
undertake any changes, are there other issues?

Thanks!

.................. Ken