[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl-lcsc] Re: [ubl-ndrsc] ATG Review of UBL Rules
Chee-Kai, Mark is probably asleep now (he's three time zones ahead of me), so I'll jump in with a quick response and let him follow up tomorrow if there's anything further to be said. | >> 2) Although the decision was made last week for local | >> element declarations, remember this was our initial | >> decision also. Further, notice that all local | >> elements are in essence being treated as global | >> with strict control over uniqueness and naming. | | Could you please elaborate on this? | | Is "the decision" referring to NDR's decision? No. Mark was reporting on a decision by UN/CEFACT ATG2 (and also pointing out that we had come to the same decision before we had put an additional year of thought into it). Mark happens to be both a co-chair of OASIS UBL NDRSC and also the chair of UN/CEFACT ATG2, as well as vice chair of the UBL TC, among his other positions of responsibility, and there are liaisons between the two groups. But no decision of ATG2 is in any way binding on UBL. | Is this a change of the global-element/global-type decision | from London's outcome? No, not at all. Jon
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]