[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ubl-lcsc] [roe] OAG Comment: Better use of Representation terms
I also agree with StreetName! Best Regards Stig Korsgaard M.Sc.E Standardisation Coordinator Tel: +45 3370 1083 Cell: +45 2121 8234 Mail: stk@finansraadet.dk Danish Bankers Association Amaliegade 7 DK-1256 Copenhagen K Tel: 3370 1000 Fax: 3393 0260 mail@finansraadet.dk www.finansraadet.dk -----Original Message----- From: Tim McGrath [mailto:tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au] Sent: 4. juli 2003 04:16 To: ubl-LCSC@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [ubl-lcsc] [roe] OAG Comment: Better use of Representation terms To facilitate debate and consensus on the reviewed items, I am posting relevant issues as discussion points. The intention is that after a one week period the team shall resolve these issues. For example, this issue will be resolved at the call on Friday July 11th. Item 2. The OAG reviewers have identified that the UBL BIE known as Street would be better called StreetName. This appears to be a better use of representation terms (in this case Name). In itself Street is a Property Term but it could be represented in other forms apart from a Name. Can anyone see why we should not have StreetName rather than Street? This could also be extended to closer scrutiny of other Property Terms. -- regards tim mcgrath phone: +618 93352228 postal: po box 1289 fremantle western australia 6160 You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl-lcsc/members/leave_workgrou p.php
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]