[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [code:type-equivalence] Straw-man 2 Code list proposal - candidate final
Ken (and the rest of codelist members),
Thanks for the work and extended explanation.
Just some quick comments/suggestions before I disappear for the
rest of the week.
1. The reasoning for having a placebo that resolves ultimately
into a xsd:token is to allow a generic validation so that local
applications can check locally based on peer-to-peer agreed-upon
code values. My suggestion is to try to do away with the current
"placebo + MSDOS-Copy". Is it possible to look at using <xsd:choice>
with one branch validating against, say, <cct:CodeType> (which
ultimately resolves into a xsd:token), and a second branch validating
against the local code list?
Also, for proper validation for the locally coded lists (long
list or short lists), we also need to consider publishing a
formula for users to use in synthesizing a namespace that
(1) users can associate with that list,
(2) will be globally unique
(e.g. my list of "apple orange peach" will have a namesapce
that is different from someone else's list of
"apple orange peach", because someone else could insert or
remove code values anytime while I might not want that to
happen at the same time)
(3) will be consistent with how code list namespaces are named
in UBL.
Best Regards,
Chin Chee-Kai
SoftML
Tel: +65-6820-2979
Fax: +65-6743-7875
Email: cheekai@SoftML.Net
http://SoftML.Net/
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, G. Ken Holman wrote:
>>At 2003-09-08 23:34 -0400, I wrote:
>>>I've uploaded "Straw-man 2" as the candidate final content related to:
>>....
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]