[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [code:type-equivalence] Straw-man 2 Code list proposal - candidate final
Ken (and the rest of codelist members), Thanks for the work and extended explanation. Just some quick comments/suggestions before I disappear for the rest of the week. 1. The reasoning for having a placebo that resolves ultimately into a xsd:token is to allow a generic validation so that local applications can check locally based on peer-to-peer agreed-upon code values. My suggestion is to try to do away with the current "placebo + MSDOS-Copy". Is it possible to look at using <xsd:choice> with one branch validating against, say, <cct:CodeType> (which ultimately resolves into a xsd:token), and a second branch validating against the local code list? Also, for proper validation for the locally coded lists (long list or short lists), we also need to consider publishing a formula for users to use in synthesizing a namespace that (1) users can associate with that list, (2) will be globally unique (e.g. my list of "apple orange peach" will have a namesapce that is different from someone else's list of "apple orange peach", because someone else could insert or remove code values anytime while I might not want that to happen at the same time) (3) will be consistent with how code list namespaces are named in UBL. Best Regards, Chin Chee-Kai SoftML Tel: +65-6820-2979 Fax: +65-6743-7875 Email: cheekai@SoftML.Net http://SoftML.Net/ On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, G. Ken Holman wrote: >>At 2003-09-08 23:34 -0400, I wrote: >>>I've uploaded "Straw-man 2" as the candidate final content related to: >>....
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]