Re: [ubl-lcsc] [code] updated Catalogue and some draft schemas

["Stephen Green" <stephen_green@bristol-city.gov.uk>]

Chee-Kai

Hi

The last meeting included a discussion about our 
previous meeting's decisions

1) to add the names and descriptions to the codes in 
codelists  

2) to include the descriptions in the catalogue 
spreadsheet

3) to somehow include the description from 2) in the 
codelist schemas.

Tim and Jon particularly discussed this and decided 
that we need to realign with our Montreal conclusion 
about the scope of the codelist team and LCSC 
codelist work, so

1) the latter would just need to concentrate on 
producing enumerated lists of codes themselves 

2) the schemas should just include these codes 
themselves at present (a Codelist SC will be proposed 
by Jon at the San Francisco TC plenary to deal with the wider issues)

3) the information gathered and produced on the 
descriptions of codes should be preserved for later 
in the spreadsheet

The result is that for now the tool shouldn't include 
any treatment of the descriptions of the codes, just 
of the codes themselves (the enumerated lists). This is to avoid committing UBL to a particular solution 
to the issues we've been raising beyond what was 
decided already in Montreal.

I hope this doesn't require inconvenient adjustments 
yet again for you Chee-Kai at this stage. It does 
allow us though to concentrate our efforts for now to 
the smaller agreed area of codelist implementation, 
leaving the wider issues to a further phase after the 
beta release.

Another output from the last LCSC call will be a 
draft 13 model with a few minor but important changes 
(three changes resulting from the codelst work). I'll update and send you the model this weekend sometime for your conversion to schemas. The firm 
intention is that this draft will be the one proposed 
as the beta on Tuesday next week.

There should be some fine tuning of the codes in use 
by UBL at the San Francisco meeting.

The three changes to the model are

1) to replace the OrderCancellation.CancellationReasonCode (was 
mandatory) with a non-code (Text) BBIE since we could 
not find a codelist and yet it is a mandatory BIE

2) for similar reasons as in 1), to remove the OrderResponseSimple.RejectionReasonCode leaving just 
the RejectionReasonNote

3) to rename the three Contact BBIEs concerned with 
contact channels to match the names or codes given 
for these in the UNCL channel codelist (for 
consistency and to leave less room for confusion)

I hope this all makes sense.

All the best

Steve