Re: AW: [ubl-lcsc] UBLish-generated (with edits) 1.0 draft 3 Schemas

[Anne Hendry <anne.hendry@Sun.COM>]

Hello Michael,

You say you have been working with NDR version 'M', but version 'M' has 
not been distributed yet by ndr.  We should work with rules that have 
been distributed by ndr, rather than their internal versions.  The last 
version that was distributed by ndr was in September - it is what is 
included in the 1.0 Beta release.  Those are the agreed rules, so to 
keep from having to redo your work I'd caution against using anything 
that is not in that Beta version until ndr has distirbuted their update. 
 NDR has said that there have been no changes to the rules since that 
September version, only descriptive text, so you should be able to work 
from the September version and still be aligned with the final ndr delivery.

Thanks,

-Anne

Michael Dill wrote:

>  
>
>     -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>     Von: dill [mailto:dill@gefeg.com]
>     Gesendet: Sonntag, 8. Februar 2004 12:26
>     An: Mcrawford@Lmi. Org; ubl-lcsc@lists.oasis-open.org; Stephen Green
>     Cc: Mavis Cournane; Lisa-Aeon
>     Betreff: AW: [ubl-lcsc] UBLish-generated (with edits) 1.0 draft 3
>     Schemas
>
>> These keep the rules about splitting reusable into
>     CommonAggregateType (cat:) and CommonBasicType (cbt:).
>     Hi Mark,
>     please help. I'm confused. We are preparing the XSD generation
>     from the models. I'd like to be in line with NDR version M. Where
>     I can find the below mentioned rules in the NDR document? Or shall
>     I consider these rules just as an intermediate step and they must
>     not be used?
>     Thanks,
>     Michael
>      
>
>         -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>         Von: Stephen Green [mailto:stephen_green@seventhproject.co.uk]
>         Gesendet: Freitag, 6. Februar 2004 07:36
>         An: ubl-lcsc@lists.oasis-open.org
>         Cc: Chin Chee-Kai
>         Betreff: [ubl-lcsc] UBLish-generated (with edits) 1.0 draft 3
>         Schemas
>
>          
>         As promised here are the Schemas, all valid, which I
>         have just generated using the UBLish tool - many
>         thanks to our friend Chin Chee-Kai (cc'd here).
>          
>         These keep the rules about splitting reusable into
>         CommonAggregateType (cat:) and CommonBasicType
>         (cbt:). Please would someone point out any rules
>         they don't keep which they should.
>          
>         All the best
>          
>         Steve 
>