Re: [ubl-lsc] Scheduling the end of the review cycle

[Nigel Wooden <nigel.wooden@spangraph.freeserve.co.uk>]

Jon,

I think that date is fine. I would also suggest that we stress that the
liaisons should not wait until they have reviewed the whole package before
returning comments - but it would be useful to us if they could feed
comments to us  throughout the review period if possible.

Regards,

Nigel.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jon Bosak" <Jon.Bosak@sun.com>
To: <ubl-lsc@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2003 6:36 AM
Subject: [ubl-lsc] Scheduling the end of the review cycle


> LSC and CSC,
>
> We've spent a lot of time talking about the beginning of this next
> review cycle, but not much time thinking about the end date.  We
> need to establish this now before we make a public announcement.
>
> The goal, of course, is to have all the input organized and ready
> for processing by the beginning of the UBL TC meeting in London on
> 28 April.  Anne Hendry has committed to creating and regularly
> maintaining an issues log as the inputs come in, but knowing how
> these things go, we can expect most of the feedback to come in
> right at the end.  Working backward from 28 April and figuring in
> some time to distribute a finished issues list to the members far
> enough in advance for them to have it in hand before setting off
> for London, Anne and I reckon that the list needs to be out to the
> TC members on Monday 21 April, and that therefore the deadline
> needs to be no later than Monday 14 April.  This would make for a
> review period of exactly 12 weeks (20 January to 14 April).
>
> Does this make sense to everyone?
>
> Jon
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
>
>