Re: [ubl-ndrsc] Instance Design for NDR document

[Eduardo Gutentag <eduardo.gutentag@sun.com>]

I think I'm missing something here.  In what way could an instance that conforms to an UBL schema *not* be
UBL conforming? And if there is no such way, what more is there to say about instances?



"GLACE, Jessica" wrote:

>
>
> Is NDR generating rules only for UBL Schema Design or are we interested in "UBL conforming" Instances as well? If it's for
> both, should we have 2 sections in the NDR document- First section for Schemas and a Second section for Instances?
>
> Kind regards,
> Jessica
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mavis Cournane [mailto:mavis.cournane@cognitran.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 4:16 AM
> To: ubl-ndrsc@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: [ubl-ndrsc] Audiences for NDR document
>
> Dear all
> one of the updates we suggested making to the NDR draft 15 document is:
>
>     We need to say who the audiences are for this document, and
>       segregate the rules and guidelines per audience (e.g. the perl
>       script vs. people writing external modules).  Ray Seddigh had
>       commented on this in Minneapolis, and would be a good source of
>       suggestions.
>
> I would like us to do some thinking about this on today's call as part of our
> NDR document review so that I can begin putting something together.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>

--
Eduardo Gutentag               |         e-mail: eduardo.gutentag@Sun.COM
XML Technology Center          |         Phone:  (510) 986-3651
Sun Microsystems Inc.          |