Re: [ubl-ndrsc] R13 contradiction

[Tim McGrath <tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au>]

Let me correct what i think is a misconception that has led to a 
spurious debate.

The problem the LC had with the documentation is not a 'bug' - it has 
nothing to do with the perl-script generation of schemas.  

it is a logical problem.  If we want to gloablly refernce things called 
"ID"  when we have many different uses of "ID" - we have to have a way 
of saying which "ID" we are talking about.  if we had a schema that said 
"ref=ID"  is it Party.ID or Transport Equipment Seal.ID ??

How else but by saying "Ref=PartyID" or "ref=TransportEquipmentSealID"?  

Dont caste off this as a perl-script bug - it is a side-effect of the 
global referencing rule.

If it is a freakish nightmare - show us what it should be.

Eve L. Maler wrote:

> I tend to agree.  This naming result is certainly not what was 
> intended; more like a freakish nightmare version...
>
>     Eve
>
> Eduardo Gutentag wrote:
>
>> If the problem is as described by Bill (fix of documentation bug
>> resulting in wrong element names [wrong in the sense of "not intended"])
>> then I agree that the bug fix should be backed out.
>
>
>

-- 
regards
tim mcgrath
fremantle  western australia 6160
phone: +618 93352228  fax: +618 93352142