[ubl-ndrsc] [Fwd: [ubl-lcsc] Re: validation of UBL Schemas for release0p70]

[Tim McGrath <tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au>]

 I think this question is better answered by someone from NDR.

Can you respond to this list and i shall forward to Ken and the LC list.


-------- Original Message --------

Subject:	[ubl-lcsc] Re: validation of UBL Schemas for release 0p70
Date:	Sat, 18 Jan 2003 20:30:59 -0500
From:	"G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com>
To:	UBL LCSC <ubl-lcsc@lists.oasis-open.org>

Can anyone help me understand the committee plans for namespaces?



What I'm missing in 0p70 that I used in 0p65 was the equivalent to:



  <xsd:schema targetNamespace="urn:oasis:names:tc:ubl:Order:1.0:0.65"

              xmlns:po="urn:oasis:names:tc:ubl:Order:1.0:0.65" ...

    ...

    <xsd:element name="Order" type="po:OrderType"/>



In 0p70 I have:



<xsd:schema ...

        <xsd:element name="Order" type="OrderDetailsType" ...



>From this I understand that the 0p70 XSD describes a vocabulary in "no 
namespace", when I had anticipated that each document type would have their 
own namespace as was hinted at in 0p65.



My stylesheets have been keyed on the namespace in my preliminary work ... 
is this use of no namespace a planned change in direction?



Thanks!



...................... Ken

-- 
regards
tim mcgrath
fremantle  western australia 6160
phone: +618 93352228  fax: +618 93352142