OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ubl-ndrsc message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Minutes: UBL NDRSC April 9 2003


Dear all
attached are the Minutes of today's very *short* meeting. Looking forward to
having all of you on the call next week to discuss vital issues like
Containership and Common Core Components.

Regards
Mavis
----------------------------------
1.  Roll Call and Welcome from the chair (Mavis), assignment of co-chair to
take minutes.
Regrets: Jim Wilson, Kris Ketels, Mark Crawford, Eve Maler
Mavis Cournane
Dan Vint
Mike Grimley
Jack Gager
Ann Hendry
Eduardo Gutentag
Jessica Glace
Paul Thorpe
Lisa Seaburg (called in briefly)

Quorum not reached after x:15 and neither was critical mass so we proceeded
informally for 15 minutes. We decided to conclude the call and defer the
items to next week.

2.  Acceptance of minutes from the previous meeting.
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl-ndrsc/200303/msg00062.html

3.  Adoption of agenda/schedule planning

Adopted. All work items appear to be in hand.


6. Containership deferred last week.

Deferred to next week

7. Issues from last week's call - ??
Deferred.


8. Common Core Components (Gunther) - Gunther wants to have this finalized
before Face to Face.
Deferred

9.  New Business:
    CCTS (Mark) - As a follow-up to the discussion on Tuesday's LCSC call,
Mark forwarded the CCTS Implementation Verification form.  He strongly
encourages LCSC to move as quickly as possible in filling out and submitting
this form.  Background information and submission requirements can be found
at: http://webster.disa.org/cefact-groups/tmg/news20030317.html.  As soon as
LCSC agrees to the submission, he would also ask that Jon notify the
UN/CEFACT TMG CCTS POC (Mark) of UBL's intent.

AH: There was a timeframe request that the review be done quickly because
they are heading towards the end right now and would like to have the review
done by UBL. They want verification that they have implemented 1.9 CCTS and
that it works from them. UBL has the most true to spec implementation and if
we could submit this verification form. The bulk of the conformance is in LC
not NDR.


9. Adjourn
x:15




[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]