[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl-ndrsc] Rule: 108 XSI prefix
Funny, I just today sent mail to Lisa saying how I didn't feel a need to comment on many of these rules, knowing they were in good hands with everyone else. :-) Yet here I am, blathering... The "xsi" prefix is meant for instances, not schemas. So what does this rule mean? XSD governs the required use of xsi:type in instances, and there is a bit more going on in that namespace than just xsi:type, so I'm pretty sure we want to be specific -- e.g., if there are any cases where we might require xsi:type although XSD doesn't (e.g., to reduce reliance on an external schema file for exposing types of elements). However, I doubt we want to do anything more than allow constructs in the xsi namespace to be used as allowed/dictated by the XSD spec, which doesn't seem to need a rule. Again, if we do turn out to need a rule, it should not make the "xsi" prefix not seem like magic. Eve Lisa-Aeon wrote: > ******************************* > [R 108] The XSI prefix SHALL be used where appropriate. > > > --- > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.498 / Virus Database: 297 - Release Date: 7/8/2003 > > You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl-ndrsc/members/leave_workgroup.php -- Eve Maler +1 781 442 3190 Sun Microsystems cell +1 781 354 9441 Web Technologies and Standards eve.maler @ sun.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]