Home page repair and moving forward with draft BDNDR 1.1

["G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com>]

Fellow UBL NDR Subcommittee members,

First, thank you for bringing to my attention that this committee was 
not referenced on the UBL home page ... I've submitted the changes in 
to the system for processing. Usually takes a while to get posted.

Next, I was thinking after our call that, perhaps, we don't have to 
push to standardized BDNDR 1.1 before the first public release of UBL 
2.3. Now I'm thinking that we use the first public release of UBL 2.3 
to test the veracity of what has been put into BDNDR 1.1.

That way we are testing both, and we aren't taking the effort to 
standardize BDNDR 1.1 before possibly finding a fault in it during 
our test of UBL 2.3.

With that in mind, does anyone object to moving forward with the UBL 
2.3 first public review using the draft BDNDR 1.1 work, and then 
finalizing BDNDR 1.1 before the final publication of UBL 2.3 having 
tested it during the public reviews?

If you agree, no need to post and fill up the mail archive ... if 
no-one disagrees then I'll bring this suggestion forward to the main 
technical committee.

. . . . . . . Ken

--
Contact info, blog, articles, etc. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/ |
Check our site for free XML, XSLT, XSL-FO and UBL developer resources |
Streaming hands-on XSLT/XPath 2 training class @ US$45 (5 hours free) |