[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ubl-psc] Re: [ubl] UBL draft 11
Tim,
How will EDIFIX know which schema to create if some models
represent more than 1 document?
Regards,
Sylvia
OK then I think we can rationalize these document models.From: Tim McGrath [mailto:tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au] Sent: Monday, December 12, 2005 11:27 PM To: Mark Leitch Cc: ubl-psc@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [ubl-psc] Re: [ubl] UBL draft 11 a. Self Billed Invoice is the same structure as an Invoice except for optionally having multiple statement references.I have removed Statement from Self Billed Invoice. I now suspect that Self Billed Invoice and Invoice are the same document type - only the direction of the exchange makes them different. So we dont need two document models. Just the Invoice will do. b. Self Billed Credit Note is exactly the same structure as Credit Note. Only the definitions change.- as Self Billled Credit Note now refers to a Billing_Document Reference, it can be covered by the normal Credit Note document structure. - as we dont define the sender and recipient, the document doesn't care that they are swapped. Can i suggest that the Self Billed Credit Note is not a new document type - just a different application of a Credit Note document? PS. i remember some discussion about the tax implications of self billed credit note, but since we have already added Tax Total to Credit Note it seems to cover both cases. c. Statement appears to have no Billing Document Reference.Statement Line now has Accounting Document Reference (the rationalized model), so this is covered. Mark Leitch wrote: Tim, -- regards tim mcgrath phone: +618 93352228 postal: po box 1289 fremantle western australia 6160 DOCUMENT ENGINEERING: Analyzing and Designing Documents for Business Informatics and Web Services http://www.docengineering.com/ |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]