[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl-psc] UBL Catalogue requirements for the textile and apparelindustry
Thanks, we will work on this soon. Also we have some more inputs about Collections of Items, but I am still thinking the way we can solve this. In a given Catalog there could be many different Collections of Items. This concept is common to many industrial sectors like ceramics, apparel, textile, ... I though we cannot change the way is structured the Catalogue line items but maybe we could add a Collections (0..n) to be used under those situations. I'll send you more details soon. Regards Roberto Tim McGrath ha scritto: > see below... > > JAVEST wrote: >> Dear PSC, >> our primary UBL ITLSC member ENEA has a long experience into the >> textile supply chain and they are promoting and implementing the UBL >> Catalogue. >> >> Please find below a set of requirements for the UBL Catalogue 2.0: >> >> 1. It is required to associate 1 or more pictures to show the item or >> parts of it. >> >> I proposed to use the attachment for this purpose: >> >> Catalogue->CatalogueLine->Item->ItemSpecificationDocumentReference->Attachment >> >> > this is possible and would be considered as an implementation profile > rule. >> 2. For a given item it is required to specify a set of variations >> (e.g. A T-Shirt is available on different colors: white, black, red, >> ... but also there are two different embroiders variations) >> >> I proposed: >> Catalogue->CatalogueLine->Item->AdditionalItemIdentification >> > as above, this is possible and would be considered as an > implementation profile rule. >> 3. About the "Brand": >> The brand name seems to be not sufficient for the textile and >> apparel industry. >> These are the additional data that could expand the Brand element: >> - Brand Logo >> - Description >> - Code >> - Market (the target market/s for this brand) >> >> NOTE: A new Brand aggregate should be required for both the Item >> level and Document level. >> At the document level a Brand could be expressed as a >> default for all items. >> > This can be considered as part of the UBL 2.1 package. I agree that as > a Brand can be used for many items its properties should be a separate > ABIE. But it needs some more detailed design, with some definitions > and examples. Perhaps create a sample spreadsheet entry for this? > At the document level we can qualify the ASBIE as being "Default". > We also have a small problem with how we deal with the existing > BrandName BBIE within Item. > > >> >> For further discussions on this argument please reply to both me and >> Arianna Brutti. >> >> Thank you in advance for your evaluations >> >> Regards, >> >> Roberto Cisternino >> Arianna Brutti (ENEA) >> >> UBL ITLSC co-chairs >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that >> generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs >> in OASIS >> at: >> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]