[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl-sbsc] Revised candidate XPath files for SBS
>> <XPath xmlns="urn:oasis:names:tc:ubl:schema:XPath-1.0" >> id="urn:oasis:names:tc:ubl:xpath:DespatchAdvice-1.0:sbs-1.0" >> xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" >> xsi:schemaLocation="urn:oasis:names:tc:ubl:schema:XPath-1.0 xpath.xsd"> >> >> in the top level element, associating the instance with the schema. > I'm not in favour of doing this ... the schema tools I use do validation > without the presence of this, and I'm of the opinion that validation is > something you do outside the instance, not inside the instance. .. > So, I can change them, but I don't think we should. What are the arguments > for including this change? . . . . . . . . Ken Ken, Greetings I asked about this in the Atlantic TC call. Mavis of the NDR team was present and could see nothing wrong with how we have it now and no-one else either objected to keeping the 'schemaLocation' details out of the instances since schema validation of these 'schema-like' XPaths-instances would likely be a rare exception (in cases where it is required there would likely be sufficient skill to still validate without the 'schemaLocation' attribute within the instance). So I agree too that we are OK leaving them out. Apologies for delaying things with this issue but I guess it's as well to get these things commented on internally before a more public review. In this case then I guess we might soon be ready, after some further changes (my action item) to index.html, for voting on this as a submission to the TC. Very many thanks All the best Steve
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]