[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Questions about the digital signature specification
Hello UBL Security SC, I am finishing up the edits on the UBL Digital Signature specification version 09 (will be 10) and have two questions for you. First, regarding this paragraph: <para>TS 101 903 is an XML electronic signature standard that can be used to create different XML Advanced Electronic Signatures <xref linkend="b_XAdES"/>. XMLDSig is a general framework for digitally signing XML documents; XAdES extends XMLDSig for use with advanced and qualified electronic signatures as specified in European Union Directive 1999/93/EC. Use of XAdES is not limited to Europe, as it is being adopted by many countries outside the EU and, at the time of publication of this specification, it is undergoing standardization in ISO TC 154 [ISO/CD 14533-2]. One important benefit of XAdES is that the validity of electronically signed documents can be extended for long periods, longer than the expiration of the electronic certificates involved in signature verification and also if underlying cryptographic keys and algorithms security becomes inadequate.</para> I don't understand the ending of the last sentence. Could someone please explain? Second, regarding this paragraph: <para>It is important to note that XAdES and XMLDSig define digital signature processing rules and syntax but do not cover the implementation of security measures required for an AdES, which are out of scope for this document. Implementation may depend on local regulations in place and specific provisions set by the authority issuing the certificates supporting the signature. The implementer has to determine the set of requirements that apply to the specific context of use and determine accordingly the suitability of the standards and the specific profiles to be used: an explicit advice is given to reference directly to any regulation applicable to the specific context of use.</para> I don't understand the reference to "explicit advice." Would it be possible to get more detail here? Best regards, Jon
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]