Re: [ubl-security] Question about the Dsig Profile as a separate deliverable

[Jon Bosak <bosak@pinax.com>]

Thanks, Oriol.

Does anyone else have an opinion on this?

Jon

Oriol Bausà Peris wrote:
> Hi Jon,
>
> I think that incorporating it into the UBL 2.1 spec itself would be the best option
>
> Best regards
> Oriol Bausà
>
> El 18/11/2011, a las 18:17, Jon Bosak escribió:
>
> > Hello UBL Security Subcommittee,
> >
> > As we begin to finish UBL 2.1, an editorial question has arisen with
> > regard to the Digital Signature Profile that you produced last year.
> >
> > In the first two public review cycles, the Profile, formatted as an
> > independent specification, has been included in the review package (in
> > the doc subdirectory).  But from an editorial point of view, it would be
> > better either to publish the Profile as a separate deliverable (i.e.,
> > make it a Committee Specification) or to incorporate the material into
> > the UBL 2.1 specification itself.  Incorporating it into the main UBL
> > 2.1 document would make relevant information easier to find.
> >
> > Before we come to a decision on this, we need to know whether members of
> > the Security Subcommittee have an opinion regarding the need to publish
> > the Profile as a separate document.  If there is such a need, then of
> > course that will decide the issue.
> >
> > Please consider this question and let us know what you think.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Jon Bosak
> > Chair, OASIS UBL TC
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: ubl-security-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: ubl-security-help@lists.oasis-open.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ubl-security-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: ubl-security-help@lists.oasis-open.org
>
> .